State v. Shook’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
April 1972
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · State v. Little · State v. Miranda · 1 Ariz. App. 27 - Finn v. J. H. Rose Truck Lines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The prosecuting attorney was severely admonished by the trial court on several occasions and both counsel were once threatened with a jail sentence if they did not quiet down. “Annoying as this conduct must have been to all participating in this trial, nevertheless this court does not find that the defendant was prejudiced. It seems seems more likely that the State’s case was prejudiced by the over zealousness of its counsel. * * * ” State v. Shook, 1 Ariz.App. 458, 461 , 404 P.2d 724, 727 (1965).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.