1 Ariz. App. 603 - Hurst v. Hurst’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably Snell v. Ruppert (1975), Jerman v. O'LEARY (1985)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sage v. Railroad Co. · Murphey v. Gray · Vann v. Union Central Life Ins. Co. · Harbel Oil Company v. Steele · 1 Ariz. App. 227 - Hurst v. Hurst
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A partner stands in a fiduciary relationship to his co-partner.”). . In their reply in support of their motion for summary judgment, Defendants argue for the first time that Wichansky must establish Zowine’s "personal participation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If a trustee mixes trust funds with his own, the entire commingled mass should be treated as trust property except in so far as the trustee may be able to distinguish what is his.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.