In Re Mozer’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2016
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1301 · 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co. · Chaffee County Fluorspar Corp. v. Athan · White v. Associated Midwest, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An individual with regular income is defined in § 101(24) of the Code as an ‘individual whose income is sufficiently stable and regular to enable such individual to make payments under a plan under chapter 13 . . . ’ The creditors rely heavily upon the use of the word ‘is’ in the statute asserting that it requires, as of the date of the petition, an existent regular and stable income. Such a view is too limited. The debtor must demonstrate that he will have income to make the payments under the plan. This may in fact be a prospective determination and is not limited to the historical view asserted. Matter of White Birch Park, 471 F.Supp. 159 (E.D.Mich.1979).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Bradley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.