Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 B.T.A. 101

Sutton v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 28, 1924

United States Board of Tax Appeals · decided 1924-11-28

Petition dismissed as premature.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1942

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1924-11-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION.

James:

¶2The taxpayer is premature in the filing of his petition. It appears that he has been notified merely of one of the steps which precede the determination of the Commissioner that a deficiency in tax exists. On the face of the petition it appears that no deficiency in tax has since the enactment of the Revenue Act of 1924 been determined by the Commissioner. Therefore, the taxpayer has not stated one of the facts essential to an appeal. Such a deficiency may never be determined. When a deficiency is determined, the taxpayer will receive the statutory 60-day notice of such determination, and upon that notice he may at that time petition this Board to hear and determine his tax liability.

/1/bta/101 · .json · Public domain