Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 B.T.A. 18

Austin v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 18, 1924

United States Board of Tax Appeals · decided 1924-10-18

Deficiency to be determined in accordance with stipulation.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1924-10-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently February 1988 · most notably Consolidated Asphalt Co. v. Commissioner (1924), Uvalde Co. v. Commissioner (1925)

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

4401924193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1decision.

¶2The taxpayer and the Commissioner having agreed that the item of $12,740.03, claimed as a deduction for loss on sale of stocks and bonds in the taxpayer’s 1920 income tax return, should be disallowed to the extent of $1,131.90, the deficiency should be computed accordingly.

¶3Final decision of this Board will be settled on consent or on seven days’ notice by either party.

/1/bta/18 · .json · Public domain