Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Cai. Cas. 152

Alexander v. Esten

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1803

New York Supreme Court · decided 1803-08-15

<p>A motion cannot be extended, to objects not specified in the notice,</p>

Relies on Outwater v. Marshall · Jackson ex dem. Sager v. Stiles

Decided 1803-08-15

¶1The Court ruled that it was the practice to coniine a party *to the objects specified in his [*153] notice, and the present being to set aside an execution, they would not allow it to be extended to the judgmental.[1]

¶2Lewis, Ch. J., absent.

¶3Ferguson v. Jones, 12 Wend. 241; 1 Cow. 135, note [1].

/1/caicas/152 · .json · Public domain