Sandelin v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably 61 Cal. 2d 716 - People v. Woody (1964), 65 Cal. 2d 349 - Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (1966)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex parte Christensen · Matter of Application of Anixter · Padgett v. District of Columbia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... provided, however, no public saloon, public bar or barroom or other public drinking place where intoxicating liquors to be used for any purpose shall be kept, bought, sold, consumed or otherwise disposed of, shall ever be established, maintained or operated within the State; provided, further, subject to the above provisions, that in hotels, boarding houses, restaurants, cafes, cafeterias and other public eating places, wines and beer may be served and consumed with meals furnished in good faith to the guests and patrons thereof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hammond v. McDonald“In 1933 the legislature enacted the present state Liquor Control Act to become operative upon the repeal of the eighteenth amendment .... (Stats. 1933, p. 1697.) ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““. . . Under our modern system of living a sandwich served in good faith as a meal would constitute a meal as contemplated by law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.