1 Cal. 3d 207 - In Re White’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
133 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 139 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 16 Cal. 4th 469 - Garcia v. McCutchen (1997), 16 Cal. 3d 1 - Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (1976)
133 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. Clark · 10 Cal. 2d 160 - Penziner v. West American Finance Co. · In Re Phillips · In Re Perez · People v. Leong Fook
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 139 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`irreconcilable, clearly repugnant, and so inconsistent that the two cannot have concurrent operation....'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““If any defendant who has been released on probation is committed to a prison in this state or another state for another offense, the court which released him or her on probation shall have jurisdiction to impose sentence, if no sentence has previously been imposed for the offense for which he or she was granted probation, in the absence of the defendant, on the request of the defendant made through his or her counsel, or by himself or herself in writing, if such writing is signed in the presence of the warden of the prison in which he or she is confined or the duly authorized representative of the warden, and the warden or his or her representative attests both that the defendant has made and signed such request and that he or she states that he or she wishes the court to impose sentence in the case in which he or she was released on probation, in his or her absence and without him or her being represented by counsel. “The probation officer may, upon learning of the defendant’s imprisonment, and must within 30 days after being notified in writing by the defendant or his or her counsel, or the warden or duly authorized representative of the prison in which the defendant is confined, report such commitment to the court which released him or her on probation. “Upon being informed by the probation officer of the defendant’s confinement, or upon receipt from the warden or duly authorized representative of any prison in this state or another state of a certificate showing that the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When the trial court suspends imposition of sentence and grants probation, no judgment is entered until such time as the probation is revoked and the defendant is sentenced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Craine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.