1 Cal. 3d 277 - People v. Brawley’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
159 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 159 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 8 Cal. 4th 1060 - People v. Rodrigues (1994), 29 Cal. 3d 733 - People v. Murtishaw (1981)
159 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Bruton v. United States · Witherspoon v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 159 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"* * * The procedure followed in at least some of the federal courts is that the trial court alone determines the admissibility of the statements; if the trial court finds that independent of the statements there is prima facie proof of the conspiracy and that the statements were made during the conspiracy and in furtherance thereof and admits the statements, the jury need not be instructed that it also must make certain findings before it may consider the evidence against an asserted conspirator other than the declarant. [Citations omitted] Thus the California procedure contains more safeguards for a defendant than the foregoing federal procedure, and if the federal procedure does not violate the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment a fortiori neither does the California procedure." [9]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jasch v. State“[Tille propriety of the denial of a motion for separate trials must, of course, be tested as of the time of the submission of the motion, and the question of error cannot be determined in the context of subsequent developments at the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Hamer did not deal with the question whether the defendant had a right to inspect the book.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Castro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.