1 Cal. 4th 266 - People v. Hull’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
239 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 241 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 5 Cal. 4th 363 - Roberts v. City of Palmdale (1993), 35 Cal. 4th 395 - People v. Panah (2005)
239 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 43 Cal. 3d 1379 - Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission · 43 Cal. 3d 1002 - People v. Woodhead · 52 Cal. 3d 894 - People v. Pieters · 68 Cal. 2d 822 - Reichert v. General Insurance of America · 49 Cal. 3d 74 - City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 241 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The determination of the question of the disqualification of a judge is not an appealable order and may be reviewed only by a writ of mandate from the appropriate court of appeal sought within 10 days of notice to the parties of the decision and only by the parties to the proceeding.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“in section 170.3, subdivision (d), applied equally to peremptory challenges and to challenges for cause. Although Hull did not decide whether section 170.3, subdivision (d), was the exclusive remedy for a party aggrieved by the grant of a request for disqualification, we think its analysis equally applicable to this situation. Code of Civil Procedure section 170.3, subdivision (d), applies to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A statute must be construed `in the context of the entire statutory system of which it is a part, in order to achieve harmony among the parts.' [Citation.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.