Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 Cal. App. 145 - Hatfield v. Casner

1 Cal. App. 145 - Hatfield v. Casner’s Empirical Analysis

1905

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 1970
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 1970

7 state decisions

4019051910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the decree of the court below [settling the executor's account and decreeing distribution] will not be disturbed unless the appellants show that their interests in the estate have suffered in some way by reason of the findings or decree of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.