Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 CALAPP3D 115 - People v. Harrison

People v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 23 Cal. 4th 866 - People v. Jorge M. (2000), 6 Cal. 3d 415 - People v. Mijares (1971)

40 state decisions

120196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neal v. State of California · Killian v. United States · 35 Cal. 2d 175 - People v. Knowles · Noyd v. Bond · People v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the hazard arising when any person carries a loaded firearm in public. ... [T]he mere fact the weapon is loaded is hazardous, irrespective of the person (except those persons specifically exempted) carrying it.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The `intent or objective' underlying the criminal conduct is not single, but several, and thus does not meet another of the tests employed to determine if Penal Code section 654 is violated. [Citation.] For an ex-convict to carry a concealable firearm is one act. But loading involves separate activity.... Thus, two acts, not a single one, are necessarily involved and bring our case outside the prohibition against double punishment for a single act or omission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to any person and to any firearm, concealable or not, but only if it [was] loaded and he carrie[d] it either on his person or in a vehicle. Neither ownership, possession, custody or control is a statutory element in the unlawful carrying of a loaded firearm in a vehicle.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.