People v. J.E.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “A probation condition ... may be challenged as unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. [Citation.] ... A restriction is unconstitutionally overbroad ... if it (1) 'impinge[s] on constitutional rights,' and (2) is not 'tailored carefully and reasonably related to the compelling state interest in reformation and rehabilitation.' [Citations.] The essential question in an overbreadth challenge is the closeness of the fit between the legitimate purpose of the restriction and the burden it imposes on the defendant's constitutional rights-bearing in mind, of course, that perfection in such matters is impossible, and that practical necessity will justify some infringement.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 232 Cal. Rptr. 3d 262 - People v. Juan R. (In re Juan R.)

2. “impose and require any and all reasonable conditions that it may determine fitting and proper to the end that justice may be done and the reformation and rehabilitation of the ward enhanced.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 245 Cal. Rptr. 3d 587 - People v. J.G. (In re J.G.)

3. “( In re E.O. (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 1149 , 1153, 115 Cal.Rptr.3d 869 .)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 232 Cal. Rptr. 3d 262 - People v. Juan R. (In re Juan R.)