Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 249

Osgood v. Hamilton

California District Court

Decided October 15, 1857

California District Court · decided 1857-10-15

The necessary facts are stated in the opinion. On motion to open the biddings upon the sale of certain real estate, and for a re-sale.

Relies on Collier v. Whipple

Decided 1857-10-15

Norton, J.

¶1In this case certain real estate, in the city of Ban Francisco, was sold under an order of the court, to effect a partition. Some of the parties in interest are infants. The property sold for §15,-000, and since then; responsible persons have offered to bid §17,000, in case a re-sale is' ordered, for which a motion is now made.

¶2In England it is the custom to open the bids, in case an advance of ten per cent, is offered. In this country, the courts have refused to adopt this custom, and it seems for good reasons. (Duncan vs. Dodd. 2 Paige, 99; Collier vs. Whipple, 13 Wend. 232.) In ease of fraud or surprise, or where the property of infant® had been manifestly sacrificed by the neglect of their guardians, relief may be granted, but this is not a case of that kind.

¶3Motion denied, and report of sale confirmed.

/1/caldistct/249 · .json · Public domain