Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Cal. Unrep. 261

Hanson v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1866

California Supreme Court · decided 1866-02-05

The suit was for the foreclosure of a mortgage given to secure the payment of a note expressed as follows: “Redwood City, Nov. 15, 1863. ‘! Twelve months after date, without grace, I promise to pay to Charles Hanson or order the sum of eighteen hundred dollars, payable in United States gold coin, or its equivalent in United States currency, for value received, with interest thereon at the rate of two per cent per month from date until paid.

Relies on Lattimer v. Ryan · Reese v. Stearns

Decided 1866-02-05

SHAFTER, J.

¶1The plaintiff was not entitled to a judgment payable in gold coin. The contract was in every material particular like that sought to be enforced in Reese v. Stearnes, 29 Cal. 273, decided at the October term, 1865.

¶2Judgment was taken against the defendants by default, entered by the direction of the plaintiff’s attorney. The *262counsel fees, the amount paid for taxes, together with the interest thereon, were improperly included in the judgment as being in excess of the relief prayed for in the complaint: Lattimer v. Ryan, 20 Cal. 628; Grautier v. English, Oct. Term, 1865.

¶3The court below is directed to modify the judgment so as to conform it to the views expressed in this opinion. Further ordered that appellant recover his costs of appeal.

We concur: Sawyer, J.; Sanderson, J.; Rhodes, J.; Currey, C. J. '
/1/calunrep/261 · .json · Public domain