Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Cal. Unrep. 78

Myers v. Liening

California Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1859

California Supreme Court · decided 1859-11-04

<p>Appeal — Amount Involved. — Appeal Does not Lie in eases where the amount involved is less than two hundred dollars.</p> <p>Appeal — Lack of Exceptions. — Where There was No Motion for a new trial in the court helow, and the instructions, for alleged error in which the appeal has been taken, were not excepted to, the appeal is to be dismissed.</p>

Decided 1859-11-04

BALDWIN, J.

¶1— There are two sufficient reasons why we cannot take notice of the errors assigned by the appellant: 1. The judgment below is for less than two hundred dollars— and we have no jurisdiction; 2. There was no motion for a new trial below and no exception taken to instructions — for alleged error in which the appeal is taken.

¶2The appeal is dismissed.

I concur: Field, C. J.
/1/calunrep/78 · .json · Public domain