Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Colo. 12

McNasser v. Sherry

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1864

Supreme Court of Colorado · decided 1864-01-15

<p>Practice—upon overruliny a demurrer. Upon overruling a demurrer to a declaration if the defendant does not plead, further judgment of nihil dieit should he entered and a jury should he impaneled to assess damages. In such case it is error to swear the jury to try the issue joined.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1901

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1864-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hardihg, 0. J.

¶1This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Arapahoe county.

¶2There is but a single question for us to decide. At the August term, 1862, of said court, the appellee recovered judgment in said district court for the sum of $296.75 in damages and costs, and this appeal is prosecuted to this court to reverse said judgment.

¶3It appears from the record that a demurrer had been filed by defendant in the court below, which was overruled, 'to which ruling an exception was taken. That afterward a jury was impaneled and sworn, well and truly to try the issue joined, etc. These facts are made apparent to us from the bill of exceptions which is contained in the record. After the finding of the verdict by the jury a motion was made to set aside the verdict on the ground that the jury had been improperly sworn. It is clear that this fact was brought to the mind of the court, and yet, disregarding the motion, judgment was rendered on the verdict.

¶4That is the error which is presented to us for our determination. There might have been another objection urged, but we will content ourselves by passing on the one before us.

¶5When the jury was sworn to well and truly try the issue joined, etc., there was no issue joined in the case then on hearing. Upon the overruling of the demurrer, and the defendant failing to file a plea to the action, the proper practice would have been to have entered a judgment of nihil dicit, and then have impaneled a jury to assess damages, and not to well and truly try the issue joined, when no issue had been joined in the pleadings.

Per curiam.

¶6The judgment of the district court is reversed, with costs. Case remanded for further proceedings.

¶7Reversed.

/1/colo/12 · .json · Public domain