1 Colo. 489
Decided February 15, 1872
Supreme Court of Colorado · decided 1872-02-15
Jones recovered judgment against Andre and Haskins ; both defendants appealed, and day was given to perfect the appeal, by bond, with security. Within the time limited Andre filed his bond, with surety, but his co-defendant did not join therein, and the condition of the bond recited an appeal by Andre only.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1872-02-15
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1912
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1was of opinion that leave to amend ought to be allowed.
¶2The motion to dismiss must .be allowed; the appeal was granted upon certain conditions, which have not been complied with. Haskins has evidently abandoned his appeal. The defendants might have prayed joint and several appeals, but they both united in the only appeal which was prayed, and a joint appeal of two cannot be prosecuted by one only. Watson v. Thrall, 3 Gilm. 69; Johnson v. Barber, 4 id. 1.
¶3Motion allowed.