1 Conn. Cir. Ct. 395 - State v. Dionne’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2005
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hayes · Desmarais v. Pinto · Roma v. Thames River Specialties Co. · McWilliams v. American Fidelity Co. · Zullo v. Zullo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As far as counsel and the court have been able to discover, the words ‘for any race’ have never been defined by the courts of Connecticut. The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia defines the word ‘race’ as ‘a contest of speed; a competitive trial of speed.’ It is ‘a competition of speed, in running, skating, riding etc.’ Webster, New World Dictionary. In construing a statute to prohibit gambling on races, the Supreme Court of Tennessee stated: ‘The term [‘race’] was used by the framer of the statute to accomplish a practical purpose and in a popular and well-defined sense; that is, in a sense which involves the idea of competitive locomotion. In other words, it here embraces every contest or trial of progression, including speed and endurance, one or both * * *.’ State v. Hayes, 116 Tenn. 40, 44 , 93 S.W. 98 , 99. Thus a trial of speed is necessary to constitute a race.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“adjective `final' in this section [§ 51-265 ] modifies the word `action' as well as the word `judgment.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.