Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Cow. 256

Tullock v. Cunningham

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1823

New York Supreme Court · decided 1823-08-15

Oil certiorari to a Justice’s Court. Debt, in the Couix below, on a Justice’s judgment, for $26,06, by Cunningham against Tullock.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1900

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1823-08-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Curia*

¶1The authority of an attorney, who appears either fof a plaintiff or defendant, before a Justice, must be proved. But a parol authority is sufficient; and the attorney himself. is competent to prove it. The defendant below could not avaü himself of any declaration made by the plaintiff to the J i . Constable in relation to the execution. Even, admitting that j ha¿ told the Constable he must have the carriage hid in for him, and he would take it in satisfaction of the execution, R would be no defence in this suit, provided the sale was fairly conducted. If the Constable, in consequence of such a. direction, had returned the execution satisfied, he might, perhaps, have justified himself by this proof: but not having done so, it cannot avail the defendant.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

/1/cow/256 · .json · Public domain