1 Cow. 49
Decided May 15, 1823
New York Supreme Court · decided 1823-05-15
Application, on behalf of the defendant, for . a re-taxation of costs. They were noticed for taxation and taxed, July 30th, 1822. The notice, with a copy of the bill of costs, was served on the agent of the defendant’s attorney, but did not . , J come to the hands of the attorney in season for him to oppos/i, owing to the distance of his residence. Judgment was signed at the last August term.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1863
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1823-05-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1October and January terms, having both elapsed, at either of which, for aught that appeared, the defendant might have made this motion, We refuse to interfere, ah though there appears to be some exceptionable items in the bill.
¶2Motion refused,
¶3 Vid. Morris et al. v. Mullet et al. (1 John. Ch. Cas. 44. S. P.)