¶1This is not necessary, on an application requiring the plaintiff to give security for costs, x
¶2Seelye, said the rule, requiring security, applies only to cases of absence from the state. (Pfister & M'Comb v. Gillespie, 2 John. Cas. 109.)
¶3We consider this application as standing upon the same ground/ The plaintiff is equally out of the reach of execution, as if absent from the state,
¶4Motion granted.