Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Dall. 127

Shoemaker v. Shirtliffe

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1785-06-15

DALLAS moved for a rule to shew cause why the execution issued in this action, should not be staid, till another action, brought upon the act of Assembly against Usury, by Shirtliffe, the present defendant, against Shoemaker, the present plaintiff, was determined.

Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1925

1 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1785-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1But

by the Court:

¶2—We cannot in this way enter into a consideration of the merits of another action. Nor ought we upon so slight a foundation to grant a rule to shew cause; for such rules by the delay which they occasion, are frequently as prejudicial to the plaintiff, as if they were made absolute.

¶3Dallas took nothing by his motion.

/1/dall/127 · .json · Public domain