¶1And
¶2said, that if the Jury were of opinion that a reasonable time had been refused, the Defendant, Stricker, could not, in an action of trespass, justify under the writ of Replevin.
¶3 See ant. 15 b.
1 Dall. 225
Hocker v. Stricker
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided September 15, 1787
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1787-09-15
IT was ruled in this case, that before the goods are removed, the Sheriff ought to allow a reasonable time, for the Defendant in Replevin to find security on a claim of property; which, in the practice of Pennsylvania, supplies the place of a writ de proprietate probanda:
Decided 1787-09-15