Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Dall. 457

Bunner v. Neil

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided September 15, 1789

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1789-09-15

<p>the rule to stay proceedings was made absolute; and the rule for payment of double costs, was discharged.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1789-09-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1899

17 state decisions

60178917901800181018201830184018501860187018801890decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1This cause was removed by Habeas Corpus from the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, and, on the trial, a verdict was found in favor of the Plaintiff, for £4. 10. 8. which the defendant paid to the Prothonotary, and then moved to stay proceedings, contending, that as the Plaintiffs demand was reduced below £. 10. by a direct payment, and not by discount, or set off, the Plaintiff must pay the costs.

¶2The Plaintiff, on the other hand, obtained a rule to shew cause, why the Defendant should not pay double costs, under the Act of Assembly, which provides, that, if the defendant removes the cause, and a sum under £.50 is found for the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall pay double costs.

After argument, by Swift, for the Plaintiff, and Tilghman, for the Defendant,the rule to stay proceedings was made absolute; and the rule for payment of double costs, was discharged.
/1/dall/457 · .json · Public domain