Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 Dall. 82

Leib v. Bolton

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1784-06-15

A MOTION was made, the 10th of November, on the part of the defendant, to set aside the return of the jury of inquiry, on affidavit of irregular proceedings; and the Court granted a rule to shew cause &c. And now two of the jurors attended and deposed, that Leib’s book, supported by his own oath, had been admitted as evidence of the delivery of a quantity of leather by Leib, to the order of Bolton, in part discharge of an agreement between them.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1979

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1784-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1But,

by the Court:

¶2We will not set aside the verdicts of juries of inquiry; nor the reports of referrees, upon frivolous grounds. Nor, will we examine into the effect of any particular piece of evidence upon the minds of the jury; for, unless it appears, that there was no proper evidence before them, we must presume that they had sufficient grounds for their inquest.

¶3The Rule discharged.

/1/dall/82 · .json · Public domain