¶1affirmed the judgment, Daggett and Edmond, Asts. dissenting, on the ground, that, for aught which appeared, Turrell was a man of property, and the ~ i • petitioner had a clear and adequate remedy against him,, for the fraud, in an action at law. ,
1 Day 107
Beardsley v. Bennett
Decided July 1, 1802
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1802-07-01
In the original petition, rri -L HIS was a petition in chancery to the County Court, stating, that on the 19th of October 1799, Turrell, one of the respondents, resident in New-Milford in the County of Litchfield, proposed to sell to the petitioner a lot of land in the Susquehanna Purchase, in Pennsylvania, and offered to procure a warrantee deed of the same from Kinney, another of the respondents, resident in Pennsylvania, defending against all claims, except the adverse…
Decided 1802-07-01