Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 D.C. 264

Loudon v. Scott

District of Columbia District Court

Decided November 15, 1805

District of Columbia District Court · decided 1805-11-15

<p>A slave brought into Alexandria in 1802, by a person removing from Maryland, and omitting to take the oath within sixty days after his removal, is entitled to freedom under the Act of the 17th of December, 1792, although the person bringing the slave was not his owner.</p>

Decided 1805-11-15

The Court

¶1instructed the jury, that if they should be satisfied, by the evidence, that the plaintiff was brought from Maryland, into the county of Alexandria, in the year 1802, by the defendant’s father, who exercised acts of ownership over him, and hired him out as his slave, and that the plaintiff has been kept in the *265said county, for one whole year thereafter, or so long at dilferent times as amount to one year, before the bringing of this action, then the plaintiff is entitled to his freedom, although the jury should be satisfied that he was the property of the defendant, at the time he was so brought in, and that the defendant took the oath on the 5lh of July, as stated in the certificate.

¶2Verdict for plaintiff/ Reversed by the Supreme Court of U. S. 3 Cranch, 324.

/1/dc/264 · .json · Public domain