¶1allowed parol evidence to show what were the accounts and contracts meant in the submission, and stopped Mr. C. Lee who had offered such evidence, and informed him that in the case of Ellzey v. Mosorop, in Washington, they had decided that where the terms of submission were uncertain, parol evidence might be given of the controversies submitted.
1 D.C. 89
Davy v. Faw
District of Columbia District Court
Decided April 15, 1802
District of Columbia District Court · decided 1802-04-15
<p>When the terms of submission to arbitration are uncertain, parol evidence may be given of the controversies submitted.</p>
Decided 1802-04-15