Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 D. Chip. 239

Mead v. Mallet

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1814

Supreme Court of Vermont · decided 1814-02-15

THIS was an action of ejectment for a farm ¡of land in Manchesr\ • \ • * . ter. On trial to the jury upon lae general issue, the plaintiff made out an apparent good title on record, and proved that he died, seized of the premises demanded.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1843

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1814-02-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court.

¶1Whatever might be considered as the true, construction of the act, were it res integra, it must now be considered, that, if a collector of a land tax, neglect to lodge in the proper office, an account of his proceedings, within thirty days from the close of his vendue, agreeably to the provisions of the act, his sales are void. Such has been the uniform construction of the act, ever' since it was passed. On the faith of this construction, numerous estates in land have been bought and sold, and are now holden, and, it would be productive of great injustice now to disturb it.

¶2Verdict for the plaintiff.

/1/dchip/239 · .json · Public domain