1 E.H. Smith 338 - Haight v. . Littlefield’s Empirical Analysis
1895
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently September 1970 · most notably 16 E.H. Smith 202 - Lewis v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co. (1900), Conabeer v. . N.Y. Central H.R.R.R. Co. (1898)
2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lord v. . Atkins · Welsh v. . Taylor · People v. . Underhill · Hennessy v. . Murdock · Taylor v. . Hopper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This conveyance and the others referred to, with the maps bounding the premises upon a street, secured to the plaintiffs an easement or right of way in the strip of land so delineated, described, and recognized. Whether it was then a public street or not, this easement or right of way was attached as an appurtenance of the land conveyed, and part of the thing granted; and thereupon the plaintiffs acquired the right to insist at all times that the way be kept open and unobstructed for the benefit of their premises, and as a means of access to and from the same. It is a property right the destruction or invasion of which constitutes a ground of relief in equity. Irrespective of the rights of the public in a public street, the owners of lots bounded upon a street have, under the circumstances disclosed, a right of way as between themselves and their grantor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Scripture v. Morris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.