Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 F.2d 1022

Docket No. 4334.

Henderson v. Rogers

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1924.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1924-10-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1933

1 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1924-10-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia; William H. Barrett, Judge.

¶2E. K. Wilcox, of Valdosta, Ga. (R. D. Smith, of Tifton, Ga., and E. K. Wilcox, of Valdosta, Ga., on the brief), for appellant.- Orville A. Park,, of Macon, Ga. (Jones, Park & Johnston, of Macon, Ga., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before WALKER,, BRYAN, and KING, Circuit Judges.

¶4WALKER, Circuit Judge.

¶5This is an appeal from a decree sustaining an attack by a trustee in bankruptcy on transfers of property made by the bankrupt, when he was insolvent, to his father’, the appellant, a little more than four months prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition, on the ground that such transfers were made and accepted with intention to delay or defraud the bankrupt’s creditors. The court’s finding and decree were in accordance with a master’s report, exceptions to which were overruled. The decree is complained of on the ground that the transfers were not shown by evidence adduced to be fraudulent and void as against creditors. We are not of opinion that the evidence was such as to require the conclusion that the transfers in question were valid as against the bankrupt’s creditors. We do not think that- the record would justify us m setting aside the conclusions successively reached by the master and the court. The decree is affirmed.

/1/f2d/1022 · .json · Public domain