Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 F.2d 864

Docket No. 2246.

Davis v. Pringle

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1924.)

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1924-09-29

2 counsel of record

Relies on Davis v. Pringle

Decided 1924-09-29

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the' Eastern District of South Carolina, at Charleston, in Bankruptcy; Henry A. Middleton Smith and Ernest F. Cochran, Judges.

¶2Alex Koplin, Gen. Atty. for U. S. Railroad Administration, of Washington, D. C., and Augustine T. Smythe, of Charleston, S. C. (Lambert McAllister, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant.

¶3N. B. Barnwell, of Charleston, S. C. (P. H. Horlbecb, Whaley, Barnwell & Grimball, and Mitchell & Horlbeek, all of Charleston, S. C., on the brief), for appellee.

¶4Before. WOODS and WADDILL, Circuit Judges, and WEBB, District Judge,

¶5*865WOODS, Circuit Judge.

¶6This appeal involves the claim of the Director General to priority of the debt duo by the bankrupt, accruing on the line of the Seaboard Air Line Railway Company during federal control. The questions made ai‘e discussed and decided in the opinion filed this day in No. 2245, Davis, Federal Agent, v. E. H. Pringle, Trustee, 1 F. (2d) 860, this day decided.

¶7For the reasons therein stated, the decree of the District Court must be affirmed.

/1/f2d/864 · .json · Public domain