United States v. Pinto’s Empirical Analysis
1 F.3d 1069 · 1993
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Hodge ex rel. Hodge v. Jones (1994), Satterlee v. Wolfenbarger (2006)
16 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3607 · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Hall v. Bellmon · Union Bank v. Wolas · Bromley v. Crisp · United States v. Pinto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have stated that, in extreme circumstances, an arrest record may be expunged after dismissal of the charges or acquittal.” (citing United States v. Friesen, 853 F.2d 816, 817 (10th Cir.1988))); United States v. Smith, 940 F.2d 395, 396 (9th Cir.1991) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While we agree that the All Writs Act plays a part in enabling the court to issue the writs ... necessary to accomplish an actual expungement, we believe that the authority to consider the issue in the first place is not contained in that Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there is a large difference between expunging the arrest record of a presumably innocent person, and expunging the conviction of a person adjudged as guilty in a court of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.