Honce v. Vigil’s Empirical Analysis
1 F.3d 1085 · 1993
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 15 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Bauchman v. West High School (1997), Witt v. Roadway Express (1998)
32 federal appellate · 15 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 3601 (§ 801 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968)) · 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (§ 804 of the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 1968))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust · Continental Ore Company v. Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the housing arrangement”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The ultimate question in a disparate treatment case is whether the defendant intentionally discriminated against plaintiff.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“harassment based on sex is a form of discrimination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.