Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 F.3d 1234

Docket No. 93-1517.

John W. Pearsall v. Viotette K. Phillips Hubert E. Phillips

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 16, 1993. Decided: August 2, 1993.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-08-02

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on William Mathews Riddick v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-08-02

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (MISC-93-2-7)

John W. Pearsall, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

John W. Pearsall appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil property action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pearsall v. Phillips, No. MISC-93-2-7 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/1/f3d/1234 · .json · Public domain