Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1 F.3d 1234

Docket No. 93-6444.

Reedy v. Hale

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 16, 1993. Decided: August 4, 1993.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-08-04

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on William Mathews Riddick v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-08-04

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-279-R)

Davey James Reedy, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Davey James Reedy appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Reedy v. Hale, No. CA-93-279-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Reedy's motion for summary judgment

/1/f3d/1234 · .json · Public domain