United States v. White’s Empirical Analysis
1 F.3d 13 · 1993
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably United States v. Rodriguez De Varon (1999), United States v. Mathis (2000)
26 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998) · 18 U.S.C. § 1542
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Blockburger v. United States · Ashe v. Swenson · United States v. Dixon · Grady v. Corbin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“defendant properly bears the burden of proof under those sections of the Guidelines that define mitigating factors”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Blockburger analysis focuses strictly on the statutory elements of crimes....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.