United Union of Roofers Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local Union No v. Gundle Lining Construction Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
1 F.3d 1429 · 1993
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Service Employees International Union, Local No. 36 v. Office Center Services, Inc. · Local 30, United Slate, Tile & Composition Roofers, Damp & Waterproof Workers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We declined to adopt the distinction proposed by Local 30 between seeking payment for work and seeking the work itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.