United States v. Weitzenhoff’s Empirical Analysis
1 F.3d 1523 · 1993
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably United States v. Burrows (1994), United States v. Weitzenhoff (1994)
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 33 U.S.C. § 1251 (Alternative Water Sources Act of 2000) · 33 U.S.C. § 1311 · 33 U.S.C. § 1319 · 42 U.S.C. § 6928 · 7 U.S.C. § 2024
Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · United States v. Dunnigan · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. Dotterweich · Liparota v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“instruct[ ] the jury on the law rather than the judge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“), located not far from Sandy Beach, a popular swimming and surfing beach on Oahu. The plant is designed to treat some 4 million gallons of residential wastewater each day by removing the solids and other harmful pollutants from the sewage so that the resulting effluent can be safely discharged into the ocean. The plant operates under a permit issued pursuant to the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(14 R.T. at 117), 2 as well as in rejecting their proposed instruction based on the defense that they mistakenly believed their conduct was authorized by the permit. 3 Apparently, no court of appeals has confronted the issue raised by appellants. 12 We review a question of statutory construction de novo. United States v. Richison, 901 F.2d 778 , 780 (9th Cir.1990).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.