United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1 F.3d 296 · 1993
Citation profile
91 federal appellate · 1 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 155 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably United States v. Dominguez Benitez (2004), United States v. Vonn (2002)
91 federal appellate · 1 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 860 (§ 419 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 2024
Relies on McCarthy v. United States · Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation · Nicholas v. United States · Nagac v. Derwinski · Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wisconsin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 155 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would have been likely to affect his willingness to plead guilty.”
22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“which does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) Did the sentencing court in fact vary from the procedures required by Rule 11, and (2) if so, did such variance affect substantial rights of the defendant.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.