Malina v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis
1 F.3d 304 · 1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Pierson v. Ray · Stump v. Sparkman · Mireles v. Waco · Bradley v. Fisher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. whether the precise act complained of is a normal judicial function; 2. whether the acts occurred in the courtroom or appropriate adjunct spaces such as the judge’s chambers; 8. whether the controversy centered around a case pending before the court; and |44. whether the acts arose directly out of a visit to the judge in his official capacity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.