1 F.3d 329 - United States v. Sinclair — 1 F.3d 329

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2019

2 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1 *330Bill Boyd, Boyd & Veigel, P.C., McKinney, TX, for defendant-appellant.

¶2Delonia A. Watson, Joe C. Lockhart, Asst. U.S. Attys., Fort Worth, TX, Marvin Collins, U.S. Atty., Dallas, TX, for plaintiff-appellee.

¶3Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges, and LITTLE *, District Judge.

¶5PER CURIAM:

¶6Clifford Sinclair, a federal prisoner, has appealed from the district court’s denial of his motion to reduce his sentence, which was filed pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. A district court’s ruling under Rule 35 will be reversed “only for illegality or gross abuse of discretion.”1United States v. Lewis, 743 F.2d 1127, 1129 (5th Cir.1984) (quoting United States v. Sparrow, 673 F.2d 862, 864 (5th Cir.1982)). We have reviewed the record and considered the arguments presented, and we do not find that the district court grossly abused its discretion.

¶7AFFIRMED.