Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 F.3d 679 - United States v. Suppenbach

United States v. Suppenbach’s Empirical Analysis

1 F.3d 679 · 1993

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
April 2021
most recently cited

32 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably United States v. Stuckey (2000), United States v. Behler (1994)

32 federal appellate ·

2301993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 47 U.S.C. § 605

Relies on United States v. Powell · Dunn v. United States · Commissioner v. Engle · Conway v. Statesman Mortgage Co. · Gregory v. Frontier Materials, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “accurate, clear, neutral, and non-prejudicial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Sufficiency-of-the-evidence review is independent of the jury's determination that evidence on other counts was insufficient . . . . '[W]e examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, giving the government the benefit of all reasonable inferences that may logically be drawn from the evidence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We will reverse the jury's verdict only if the evidence ... is such that a reasonable minded jury must have entertained a reasonable doubt as to the government's proof of one of the essential elements of the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.