Security Bank of Marshalltown v. Newman’s Empirical Analysis
1 F.3d 687 · 1993
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Handeen v. Lemaire (1997), Marcelino Barbosa
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 1302 · 11 U.S.C. § 1306 · 11 U.S.C. § 1327 · 11 U.S.C. § 345 · 11 U.S.C. § 347 · 11 U.S.C. § 349 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Laughlin v. Internal Revenue Service · Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Garay · Nash v. Kester · Lindberg Armstrong v. A Lindberg · Resendez v. Lindquist
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... revests the property of the estate in the entity in which such property was vested immediately before the commencement of the case....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The mere revesting of the property in the debtor upon Chapter 13 plan confirmation does not convert property of the estate into property of the debtor. Instead, the revested property remains property of the estate subject to the terms of the order of confirmation and all the protections of § 362(a). “The estate preservation approach” line of cases rely on Section 1306(a), and give little effect to Section 1327.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(b) Except as otherwise provided in the plan or the order confirming the plan, the confirmation of a plan vests all of the property of the estate in the debtor. (e) Except as otherwise provided in the plan or in the order confirming the plan, the property vesting in the debtor under subsection (b) of this section is free and clear of any claim or interest of any creditor provided for by the plan.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.