Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 1 F.3d 968 - Khader v. Aspin

Khader v. Aspin’s Empirical Analysis

1 F.3d 968 · 1993

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
February 2018
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 26 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Simms v. Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (1999), Mackenzie v. Denver City and County of (2005)

21 federal appellate · 26 district ·

340199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Brown v. General Services Administration · Isaksen v. Vermont Castings, Inc. · Nobile v. Schindler · Kiehn v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when a complainant refuses or fails to provide the agency information sufficient to evaluate the merits of the claim, he or she cannot be deemed to have exhausted administrative remedies.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'[E]xhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite' to instituting a Title VII action in federal court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Although § 2000e-16(c) permits an employee to file suit in federal court alleging a violation of § 2000e-16(a),”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.