Markham Concepts v. Hasbro’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 101 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 203 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 304 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid · Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. · Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick · Mills Music, Inc. v. Snyder · United States v. Chhien
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the power to terminate the grant of a copyright after a certain period of time, see 17 U.S.C. §§ 203 , 304(c), 304(d), thereby permitting them to extricate themselves from 'ill-advised' grants made before the 'true value' of their work was apparent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“rais[ed] fact- intensive mixed questions, which we review with some deference to 20Notably, in justifying the substantial amount of attorney's fees it sought for the proceedings in district court, Hasbro asserted that the Markham parties'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“) was with Link Research Corporation, co-founded by Klamer and Art Linkletter (a well-known radio and television personality). The agreement, inter alia, required Markham to assign to Link any copyright, patent, or trademark rights”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.