Armstrong v. Missouri

¶1Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se civil rights complaint against multiple defendants. After careful review of the record, we conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)®, (ii); Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2), (e)(1); Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 267-68, 113 S.Ct. 753, 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993); West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48, 108 S.Ct. 2250,101 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).