State v. Acuna’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1988
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Schmerber v. State of California · Washington v. Texas · United States v. Dionisio · Burns v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"F.R.Cr.P. 3.220 was taken from A.B.A. Standard 3.1 relating to Discovery and Procedure Before Trial. The commentary thereto points out that the purpose of the subject provision is to establish `procedures by which the prosecutor can discover information about the person of the accused after charges are filed.' The commentary suggests that the rule was not designed to affect the prosecutorial investigative process which normally occurs (and is completed) prior to the filing of charges." State v. Acuna, 1 Fla. Supp.2d at 30 n. 4.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“by which the State may compel an individual to provide evidence of physical characteristics.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.