Sklar v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1975
4 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrell v. United Air Lines Transport Corporation · 31 F. Supp. 299 - Gray v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. · 26 F. Supp. 715 - Crim v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co. · 27 F. Supp. 412 - Bossard v. McGwinn · 29 F. Supp. 90 - Crum v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. would be to defeat the purpose of the rule—which is to avoid circuity of action and to adjust, in a single suit, several phases of the same controversy as it affects the parties. [Sitiar, supra, p. 416]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.